- $KIMCHI surged to ~$14M market cap after Pump.fun co-founder @a1lon9 reposted a promo, then collapsed over 95% to ~$284K after he deleted it
- Lookonchain identified coordinated wallets that pre-bought $KIMCHI at low prices and exited for over $385,000 in combined profit
- @kimchi1x received 500M $KIMCHI tokens before posting the promotion; one tracked wallet spent $144,000 and retained most holdings at an $88,000 loss
- Neither @a1lon9 nor @kimchi1x issued any public explanation for the deleted post, removed repost, or token allocation
$KIMCHI, a Solana-based memecoin, surged to a peak market capitalization of approximately $14–15 million before collapsing by more than 95% within hours — falling to roughly $284,000 in market cap with reported 24-hour trading volume of approximately $9.3 million. The token’s entire lifecycle — from launch to near-zero — played out in a single session, leaving the vast majority of buyers with near-total losses.
The Move: According to on-chain investigator Lookonchain, crypto trader Kimchi (@kimchi1x) received 500 million $KIMCHI tokens and subsequently published a promotional post about the token. Pump.fun co-founder Alon (@a1lon9) then reposted the promotion — a signal that the market interpreted as an implicit endorsement from one of the most recognizable names in Solana memecoin infrastructure. Speculative buying flooded in, pushing the market cap from near-zero to approximately $14 million. Shortly after, Alon removed the repost. Kimchi deleted the original promotional post and removed “pumpfun” from his profile bio. Lookonchain’s on-chain analysis identified that multiple coordinated wallets had pre-positioned in $KIMCHI at low prices before the promotion went live, then exited into the buying frenzy — booking a combined profit of over $385,000. One wallet alone spent approximately $144,000 on $KIMCHI and later showed an $88,000 unrealized loss, retaining most of its position rather than fully exiting. On-chain records are visible at Solscan wallet 4RZD…mxL4, 98xo…iFH, and 5qVR…wg9M.
What This Signals: The sequence — pre-positioned wallets, influencer promotion, immediate reversal upon repost removal — fits the structural profile of a coordinated pump-and-exit event. On-chain analysts interpret the $385,000+ profit extraction across multiple wallets as evidence of deliberate front-running, where insiders accumulated before the promotion was made public, then sold into retail demand generated by @a1lon9’s repost. It is important to note that Lookonchain has labeled these actors as “scammers” in its reporting, but criminal intent and definitive wallet ownership have not been independently verified at the time of writing. Neither @kimchi1x nor @a1lon9 issued a public explanation for the deleted post, removed repost, or the 500 million token allocation to Kimchi’s wallet. For retail participants, the critical structural reality is that once the repost was removed, the token had no remaining demand catalyst — and the 95%+ collapse reflected that immediately. There is no identifiable support level to watch; the token has effectively returned to its pre-promotion state near zero. This episode is consistent with patterns seen in other influencer-adjacent memecoin launches, not unlike the rapid rotations documented in large whale capital rotations — though those involve fundamentally different assets and intent.
Forward Outlook: The wallets flagged by Lookonchain remain active on Solana and should be monitored for further token launches or promotional activity tied to known influencer accounts. Any future token allocation to @kimchi1x’s wallet — visible on Solscan — would constitute an early warning signal for an analogous setup. The broader implication for Pump.fun’s ecosystem is significant: a co-founder’s repost, even if brief and subsequently deleted, carries enough market weight to move a memecoin to an eight-figure market cap within minutes. Pump.fun has not issued a statement addressing the incident or @a1lon9’s role. On-chain community reaction, as captured by Lookonchain’s reporting, has centered on the $385,000 profit figure as the defining evidence of pre-coordination — though formal attribution remains an open investigative question.
Source: solscan.ioFrequently Asked Questions
Who is @a1lon9 and why did his repost matter so much to $KIMCHI’s price?
How much did the coordinated wallets profit from the $KIMCHI pump-and-dump?
Where can I verify the on-chain wallet activity related to $KIMCHI?
Is $KIMCHI likely to recover after the 95% crash?
Source: Lookonchain · Published by CoinsProbe Markets Desk
The opinions and market insights shared on CoinsProbe represent the views of individual authors based on prevailing market conditions at the time of publication. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk and volatility. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and seek professional financial advice before making investment decisions. CoinsProbe and its contributors do not accept responsibility for financial losses or decisions made based on published content.
CoinsProbe may publish sponsored articles, affiliate links, or promotional collaborations. All sponsored material is clearly labeled to maintain transparency with our audience. Our editorial decisions remain fully independent, and advertising partnerships do not influence reviews, rankings, or published opinions.
Since 2023, CoinsProbe has delivered reliable insights on cryptocurrency, blockchain, and digital assets. Our content is created by experienced researchers and analysts who follow strict editorial standards focused on accuracy, transparency, and credibility. Every article is carefully reviewed and verified using trusted sources and current market data. We provide unbiased analysis and timely updates covering everything from emerging crypto projects to major industry developments.